When Opus 4.6 dropped this morning, it made me reflect on something I've been wanting to try for the past two years. The results? They changed how I think about software engineering forever.

# The Challenge: A PHP Game Backend Under Pressure

Here's the situation: I had a PHP backend handling user scores CRUD and authentication for a game. When concurrent users spiked, PHP performance became painfully bad. Instead of throwing money at server specs, I wanted to leverage Node.js's async architecture to make the server lighter and faster.

๐Ÿ’ก
The Core Idea: Same business logic, same encryption methods โ€” just a tech stack conversion. Feed the entire PHP codebase to an AI, get a Node.js boilerplate out, and finish the rest manually.

Back then (2 years ago), I tried creating a Custom GPT, feeding it all my PHP files, and asking it to convert. It didn't quite work out โ€” the models weren't there yet. But fast forward to December 2025 with Opus 4.5, and everything changed.

# PHP โ†’ Node.js: One Afternoon's Work

With Claude Opus 4.5 alone, I converted the entire game backend from PHP to Node.js in a single afternoon. Not just surface-level conversion โ€” we're talking:

  • โœ… Matching the existing database's password encryption (so ongoing users seamlessly transition)
  • โœ… Preserving all business logic and CRUD operations
  • โœ… Auth flow working identically to the original
  • โœ… Async architecture ready for high concurrency
The Prompt Strategy
// The key prompt pattern:
// 1. Feed the ENTIRE existing codebase as context
// 2. Specify the target tech stack  
// 3. Demand matching business logic + encryption
// 4. Request matching DB schema compatibility

"Convert this PHP backend to Node.js/Express.
 Keep all business logic identical.
 Match the password encryption method exactly
 (including salt handling) so existing DB records
 work seamlessly. Generate unit tests for all
 API endpoints."

# Laravel 8 โ†’ Laravel 12: The 20-Hour Sprint

Next challenge: upgrading a PHP 7.4 / Laravel 8 project all the way to PHP 8.4 / Laravel 12. Normally, you'd go step by step:

Laravel 7
โ†’
8
โ†’
9
โ†’
10
โ†’
11
โ†’
12

The estimated timeline? About 3 weeks of careful, incremental migration. Same functionality, same business logic โ€” just updating the structure, syntax, and patterns for each version jump.

โšก
The Result: Working as a duo with AI, I completed the full upgrade in roughly 20 consecutive hours. From 3 weeks down to less than a day. Done.

# Java Android โ†’ Swift iOS: Zero Swift Knowledge Required

This one still blows my mind. I took an entire Java Native Android project, fed it to the model for structure & code analysis, and then asked it to generate an equivalent Swift iOS Native project. Out came:

  • ๐Ÿ“ฑ Complete Swift project with proper iOS architecture
  • ๐Ÿ”— Backend API integration already wired up
  • ๐Ÿงช Full unit testing for API and auth features
  • ๐ŸŽจ UI needed some polish (naturally), but functionally complete

Here's the kicker: I don't know a single line of Swift. Yet I now have access to iOS's native power. Before AI, this kind of cross-platform leap was a distant dream for a single developer.

# Why Conversion Projects Are Perfect for AI

The pattern that makes these conversions work so well is that they provide both content and context in abundance:

01

Clear Source of Truth

"Don't know what logic to write? Go look at the original codebase."

02

Defined Target Tech

"What technology to use? Whatever I tell you to use."

03

Measurable Completeness

"How far to go? Until the new codebase matches every function and logic of the original."

This gives AI a clear ongoing reference and a precise destination. For models with large token limits and memory context โ€” like Opus โ€” they can handle everything at once. And even if a single pass isn't enough, you can break it down: "Take feature X from the Java project and add it to the Swift project now."

# Beyond Code Conversion: Security, IoT, and More

The applications extend far beyond code conversion. Cybersecurity, IoT โ€” if you have the right modules and components, the only limit is your own engineering intuition. AI becomes the ultimate force multiplier.

๐Ÿ”’
A note on security: While AI can assist with security testing and offensive research, always operate within ethical and legal boundaries. Use dedicated security-focused tools and proper authorization for any penetration testing activities.

# The Future: One Engineer + AI = Unlimited Potential

In an industry where teams are getting leaner, AI's power should be embraced as a force multiplier. Think about it:

Before AI

~18 people coordinating, explaining contexts back and forth, managing dependencies between team members

VS

With AI

One scalable engineer + the best model + token budget = faster delivery, better security, no context-switching overhead

When a product is usable, its features are functional, and its security is solid โ€” that's all you need to go live. I know many of you are already quietly grinding on your own products. The era of the solo product owner is here.

๐Ÿš€

From beginners to senior engineers โ€” I hope everyone becomes a product owner in their own right. The tools are here. The leverage is real. The only question is: what will you build?